On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:21 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, to summarize then... > > 1/ It stands to reason that we should make Tuscany error messages as > useful and as friendly as we can > 2/ Where we know that an error is related to an SCA specification > compliance statement, include the number at the start of the message > e.g. [ASM_XXXXX] The error message... > 3/ Many Tuscany specific error message will not be related to SCA > specification compliance numbers. This is OK. We are just providing > specification links where they are appropriate. > > Simon >
Much better now, +1 -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
