+1.
Thanks,
Raymond
--------------------------------------------------
From: "Simon Laws" <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2009 2:21 AM
To: <[email protected]>; <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: [2.x] error message consistency
Ok, to summarize then...
1/ It stands to reason that we should make Tuscany error messages as
useful and as friendly as we can
2/ Where we know that an error is related to an SCA specification
compliance statement, include the number at the start of the message
e.g. [ASM_XXXXX] The error message...
3/ Many Tuscany specific error message will not be related to SCA
specification compliance numbers. This is OK. We are just providing
specification links where they are appropriate.
Simon
