Actually it looks like ASM_9999_TestCase isnt a real test so thats one less to look at.
...ant On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 8:43 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm still getting a fail running ASM_6033_TestCase, is there some > OASIS local fix you've got to get that passing? > > I've now done the three remaining 500x ones so that leaves only these > remaining: > > testDummy(client.ASM_8001_TestCase) > testDummy(client.ASM_8011_TestCase) > testDummy(client.ASM_8017_TestCase) > testDummy(client.ASM_9999_TestCase) > testDummy(client.ASM_12003_TestCase) > testDummy(client.ASM_12004_TestCase) > testDummy(client.ASM_12005_TestCase) > testDummy(client.ASM_12007_TestCase) > testDummy(client.ASM_12008_TestCase) > testDummy(client.ASM_12011_TestCase) > testDummy(client.ASM_12012_TestCase) > testDummy(client.ASM_13004_TestCase) > > ...ant > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I have fixed the error messages for 6001, 6031, 6032, and 6033. They are >> passing now. >> >>> testDummy(client.ASM_6001_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_6031_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_6032_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_6033_TestCase) >> >> ASM_6016 might need some discussions with the spec group. >> >>> testDummy(client.ASM_6016_TestCase) >> >> Thanks, >> Raymond >> -------------------------------------------------- >> From: "ant elder" <[email protected]> >> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 1:54 AM >> To: <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: OASIS compliance test status >> >>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:08 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> SCA-J CAA tests: >>>> >>>> Failed tests: >>>> testDummy(client.BaseJAXWSTestCase) >>>> Tests run: 157, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 78 >>>> >>>> Woot! >>>> >>>> (the BaseJAXWSTestCase fail and 78 skipped are just ignorable setup >>>> things from the OASIS test config) >>>> >>>> ...ant >>>> >>> >>> The SCA-J CAA tests are done but there's still fails remaining on the >>> assembly tests, here's the list: >>> >>> testDummy(client.ASM_5007_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_5023_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_5033_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_6001_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_6016_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_6031_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_6032_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_6033_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_8001_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_8011_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_8017_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_9999_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_12003_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_12004_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_12005_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_12007_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_12008_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_12011_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_12012_TestCase) >>> testDummy(client.ASM_13004_TestCase) >>> >>> I'll go look at some starting at the top with 5007, 5023, and 5033. We >>> need to decide if we still want to hold the M4 release for finishing >>> this, will anyone else be helping on these this week? >>> >>> ...ant >> >> >
