I took a look at the 80xx series, and below is a summary of the issues : Failed tests: testDummy(client.ASM_8001_TestCase) - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3334 testDummy(client.ASM_8004_TestCase) - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3323 testDummy(client.ASM_8005_TestCase) - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3335 testDummy(client.ASM_8007_TestCase) - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3355 testDummy(client.ASM_8008_TestCase) - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3355 testDummy(client.ASM_8009_TestCase) - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3355 testDummy(client.ASM_8011_TestCase) - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3336 testDummy(client.ASM_8017_TestCase) - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3337 (tuscany) testDummy(client.ASM_8018_TestCase) - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-3355
Except for ASM_8017 which has TUSCANY-3337 opened for it, most of the failures are related to required fixes on the OASIS side. On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 3:52 AM, Ramkumar R <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ant, > > Here is the latest status on 1200x series... > > testDummy(client.ASM_12003_TestCase) - OASIS issue TUSCANY-3339 & > TUSCANY-3338 > testDummy(client.ASM_12004_TestCase) - OASIS issue TUSCANY-3340 > testDummy(client.ASM_12005_TestCase) - TUSCANY-3326 > testDummy(client.ASM_12007_TestCase) - TUSCANY-3326 > testDummy(client.ASM_12008_TestCase) - TUSCANY-3326 > testDummy(client.ASM_12011_TestCase) - TUSCANY-3326 > testDummy(client.ASM_12012_TestCase) - passes for me > > 12005 to 12011 needs a fix in Tuscany code for TUSCANY-3326. I am working on > it to fix the same.... should be done by tomorrow. > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 2:47 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> I've fixed 13004, and found oasis issues with the testcase for the >> 80xx ones which I've raised JIRAs for, so that now just leaves the >> 120xx ones, I know you were looking at these Ram - which ones haven't >> you looked at yet so i can help? >> >> ...ant >> >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 9:07 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> wrote: >> > ASM_6033 is commented out in the sca-assembly/pom.xml. Before the OASIS >> > folks fix that, I had to run "mvn" manually under that module to produce >> > the >> > zip contribution so that I can run the test case. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Raymond >> > -------------------------------------------------- >> > From: "ant elder" <[email protected]> >> > Sent: Tuesday, October 27, 2009 1:43 PM >> > To: <[email protected]> >> > Subject: Re: OASIS compliance test status >> > >> >> I'm still getting a fail running ASM_6033_TestCase, is there some >> >> OASIS local fix you've got to get that passing? >> >> >> >> I've now done the three remaining 500x ones so that leaves only these >> >> remaining: >> >> >> >> testDummy(client.ASM_8001_TestCase) >> >> testDummy(client.ASM_8011_TestCase) >> >> testDummy(client.ASM_8017_TestCase) >> >> testDummy(client.ASM_9999_TestCase) >> >> testDummy(client.ASM_12003_TestCase) >> >> testDummy(client.ASM_12004_TestCase) >> >> testDummy(client.ASM_12005_TestCase) >> >> testDummy(client.ASM_12007_TestCase) >> >> testDummy(client.ASM_12008_TestCase) >> >> testDummy(client.ASM_12011_TestCase) >> >> testDummy(client.ASM_12012_TestCase) >> >> testDummy(client.ASM_13004_TestCase) >> >> >> >> ...ant >> >> >> >> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Raymond Feng <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hi, >> >>> >> >>> I have fixed the error messages for 6001, 6031, 6032, and 6033. They >> >>> are >> >>> passing now. >> >>> >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_6001_TestCase) >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_6031_TestCase) >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_6032_TestCase) >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_6033_TestCase) >> >>> >> >>> ASM_6016 might need some discussions with the spec group. >> >>> >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_6016_TestCase) >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> Raymond >> >>> -------------------------------------------------- >> >>> From: "ant elder" <[email protected]> >> >>> Sent: Monday, October 26, 2009 1:54 AM >> >>> To: <[email protected]> >> >>> Subject: Re: OASIS compliance test status >> >>> >> >>>> On Fri, Oct 23, 2009 at 11:08 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> >> >>>> wrote: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> SCA-J CAA tests: >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Failed tests: >> >>>>> testDummy(client.BaseJAXWSTestCase) >> >>>>> Tests run: 157, Failures: 1, Errors: 0, Skipped: 78 >> >>>>> >> >>>>> Woot! >> >>>>> >> >>>>> (the BaseJAXWSTestCase fail and 78 skipped are just ignorable setup >> >>>>> things from the OASIS test config) >> >>>>> >> >>>>> ...ant >> >>>>> >> >>>> >> >>>> The SCA-J CAA tests are done but there's still fails remaining on the >> >>>> assembly tests, here's the list: >> >>>> >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_5007_TestCase) >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_5023_TestCase) >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_5033_TestCase) >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_6001_TestCase) >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_6016_TestCase) >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_6031_TestCase) >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_6032_TestCase) >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_6033_TestCase) >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_8001_TestCase) >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_8011_TestCase) >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_8017_TestCase) >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_9999_TestCase) >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_12003_TestCase) >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_12004_TestCase) >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_12005_TestCase) >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_12007_TestCase) >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_12008_TestCase) >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_12011_TestCase) >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_12012_TestCase) >> >>>> testDummy(client.ASM_13004_TestCase) >> >>>> >> >>>> I'll go look at some starting at the top with 5007, 5023, and 5033. >> >>>> We >> >>>> need to decide if we still want to hold the M4 release for finishing >> >>>> this, will anyone else be helping on these this week? >> >>>> >> >>>> ...ant >> >>> >> >>> >> > > > > > -- > Thanks & Regards, > Ramkumar Ramalingam > -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/
