On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 2:01 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 1:49 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The default factory code, as it appears in the spec, seems to assume a >> single domain per JVM as the domainURI plays no role in selecting the >> factory instance in the default case. Was that the intention? Seems >> restrictive compared to what we had originally envisaged, for example, >> suppose a client wants to talk to services from more than one domain. >> > > That doesn't necessarily mean a single domain per JVM does it, as the > factory impl itself can still use different domains based on the > domain URI. It does seem like right now the OASIS code assumes one > discovered factory impl per JVM, which i thought wasnt the intention > (thats what I just posted about on the other thread about the client > api). > > ...ant >
Well it could guess I suppose but AFAICT the factory impl only gets domain uri information at construction time. Once constructed you're into getService() which doesn't take domain uri information. Simon
