On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 9:15 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:03 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>> To help try to get this out quickly I've had a look right away.
>> There's one issue which i think does need to be fixed which is several
>> copies of Dojo have got included in the src distribution so the src
>> distro LICENSE is out of date. It looks like including Dojo is an
>> accident, probably as the build is putting it in src/main/resources
>> instead of target/ and that means when the src distro is built it got
>> included.
>>
>
> AFAIK, we are only shipping dojo in web-javascript-dojo, which has
> proper LICENSE and NOTICE pieces from Dojo... and all other samples
> download dojo from ant script... having said that, if you know a
> particular place where this is happening, please let me know.
>
>> There's a few other things that could be fixed if there's a respin
>> though they're not strictly release blockers if they're not fixed:
>>
>> The binary distro license has the wrong jar version for several jars,
>> it should have:
>> asm-3.1.jar
>> lucene-core-2.9.1.jar
>> lucene-highlighter-2.9.1.jar
>> lucene-memory-2.9.1.jar
>>
>
> These were fixed by Simon in 903640.
>
>> There are some license headers missing reported in the rat report, eg
>> in hessian binding
>>
>> The site.xml is not signed in tuscany-sca-1.6-updatesite
>>
>> sample quote-xquery doesn't work and the chat sample webapp doesn't
>> work properly in IE. I've not tried all the other samples but the
>> other ones i tried worked ok.
>>
>
> Did they ever worked well in IE ? Were they working in 1.5.1 ? Just
> trying to identify if this is a regression or more like a
> cross-browser issue we haven't taken care in the past...
>

I'll take a look at the other questions you ask now but i don't think
we must worry about the chat sample IE issue. It did used to work in
IE, don't know if it did in 1.5.1, but its not the most commonly used
thing so i don't think its a biggee to get fixed for 1.6.

   ...ant

Reply via email to