On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 3:27 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>> I wasn't advocating removing the separate property file! This is
>> generated stuff so it's not like we have to do work to keep it in
>> sync.
>>
>> Simon
>>
>
> Ah ok sorry i misunderstood, alright I've just tried to do that but i
> can't actually see how to easily get it done. The problem is with the
> way we have the separate META-INF\MANIFEST.MF file in the module
> top-level folder which is copied into the final jar by the Tuscany
> plugin and I can't yet find a way to get the updated manifest to be
> put in the jar without actually updating the top-level
> META-INF\MANIFEST.MF file which would mean it would always be flagged
> as updated in svn after a build which isn't very good. Using the jar
> plugin as the webpage shows doesn't work as that uses the wrong
> manifest, and so does using the manifest in target/classes during the
> build.
>
>   ...ant
>

I configured the plugin to be more tolerant to fails when discovering
the svn revision (see r904595) . This should avoid issues when
building from a git copy of the svn repo.

-- 
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
http://lresende.blogspot.com/

Reply via email to