On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> The difference between the old otest setup and the tests in trunk is >> that the trunk ones use the JDK XML parser and the otests using >> Woodstox. That was also causing POL_4013 and POL_4028 to fail. I've >> added the Woodstox impl dependency to the trunk policy tests and >> POL_4013 passes but POL_4028 gets further but still fails for me but >> it does in the otests for me too. I'll try adding woodstox to the JCA >> tests to see if that fixes JCA_110004 too, though it would be good to >> fully understand why these are failing and try to fix it or at least >> document what the restrictions are when using the Sun JDK. >> >> ...ant >> > > Interesting. So POL_4028 fails for you in the otest module? It passes > for me. What does it fail with in otest for you? > > Simon >
In both trunk and otest: org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:<[excep]tion> but was:<[POL_4028 request no invoca]tion> But actually i haven't done a full build yet this morning so let me try that first to see if there have been any changes that might have fixed it. ...ant
