On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:59 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> The difference between the old otest setup and the tests in trunk is >>> that the trunk ones use the JDK XML parser and the otests using >>> Woodstox. That was also causing POL_4013 and POL_4028 to fail. I've >>> added the Woodstox impl dependency to the trunk policy tests and >>> POL_4013 passes but POL_4028 gets further but still fails for me but >>> it does in the otests for me too. I'll try adding woodstox to the JCA >>> tests to see if that fixes JCA_110004 too, though it would be good to >>> fully understand why these are failing and try to fix it or at least >>> document what the restrictions are when using the Sun JDK. >>> >>> ...ant >>> >> >> Interesting. So POL_4028 fails for you in the otest module? It passes >> for me. What does it fail with in otest for you? >> >> Simon >> > > In both trunk and otest: > > org.junit.ComparisonFailure: expected:<[excep]tion> but was:<[POL_4028 > request no invoca]tion> > > But actually i haven't done a full build yet this morning so let me > try that first to see if there have been any changes that might have > fixed it. > > ...ant >
Full build done, still have POL_4028 failing and JCA_11004 passing. ...ant
