On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:35 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >> What if anything do we need to do to tidy up the samples for the >> upcoming release? Consistency across similar types of samples seems >> like it could be improved for example so they're run in similar ways. >> I've been slowly going through making the standalone contribution >> samples runnable using "mvn tuscany:run" and the webapp samples with >> "mvn jetty:run", what else would people like to see? >> >> ...ant >> > > Well personally I'd rename some of them so that the technology that > they're trying to demonstrate comes first (and I'm happy to do that if > no-one objects). Some of them are general and their names are fine. > I'd also create a sub directory to hold samples with multiple parts, > e.g. a reference and a service. It just looks a jumble at the moment. >
Could you give some examples of what you'd change? Here's the list of the top level samples: binding-ws-calculator calculator calculator-equinox calculator-osgi calculator-rmi-reference calculator-rmi-service dosgi-calculator dosgi-calculator-operations dosgi-dynamic-calculator dosgi-dynamic-calculator-operations helloworld helloworld-bpel helloworld-scaclient helloworld-spring helloworld-ws-sdo implementation-java-calculator store store-webapp ...ant
