On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:42 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 12:05 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 11:35 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> What if anything do we need to do to tidy up the samples for the >>>> upcoming release? Consistency across similar types of samples seems >>>> like it could be improved for example so they're run in similar ways. >>>> I've been slowly going through making the standalone contribution >>>> samples runnable using "mvn tuscany:run" and the webapp samples with >>>> "mvn jetty:run", what else would people like to see? >>>> >>>> ...ant >>>> >>> >>> Well personally I'd rename some of them so that the technology that >>> they're trying to demonstrate comes first (and I'm happy to do that if >>> no-one objects). Some of them are general and their names are fine. >>> I'd also create a sub directory to hold samples with multiple parts, >>> e.g. a reference and a service. It just looks a jumble at the moment. >>> >> >> Could you give some examples of what you'd change? Here's the list of >> the top level samples: >> >> binding-ws-calculator >> calculator >> calculator-equinox >> calculator-osgi >> calculator-rmi-reference >> calculator-rmi-service >> dosgi-calculator >> dosgi-calculator-operations >> dosgi-dynamic-calculator >> dosgi-dynamic-calculator-operations >> helloworld >> helloworld-bpel >> helloworld-scaclient >> helloworld-spring >> helloworld-ws-sdo >> implementation-java-calculator >> store >> store-webapp >> >> ...ant >> > > I would change this list to be... > > > binding-ws-calculator > binding-ws-sdo-helloworld > binding.sca-calculator > binding-rmi-calculator > binding-rmi-calculator-reference > binding-rmi-calculator-service > launcher-equinox-calculator > osgi-bundle-calculator > dosgi-calculator > dosgi-calculator > dosgi-calculator-operations > dosgi-dynamic-calculator > dosgi-dynamic-calculator > dosgi-dynamic-calculator-operations > implementation-java-calculator > implementation-java-helloworld > implementation-bpel-helloworld > implementation-spring-helloworld > scaclient-helloworld > store > store-webapp > > Simon > > -- > Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org > Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com >
Another thing I'm concerned about re. samples is that we don't now have good representation in itest/distribution. Am looking at if we can pull some more in (particularly one of the osgi based ones as we keep breaking the osgi based otest runtime). I note that quite a few have been removed recently, e.g. the webapp ones. Were these the ones that were proving unreliable? Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
