What do others think about these renames? I don't think this new name "contribution-binding-sca-calculator" is really an improvement over the old simple name "calculator". Its too long and i'm not sure the calculator sample point is mainly about binding-sca isn't it more just demonstrating some simple assembly? Also, i though the agreement on the sample tidy up thread was on using sub-directories to group samples instead of the sample name?
...ant On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:19 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > Author: slaws > Date: Tue May 18 09:19:30 2010 > New Revision: 945552 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=945552&view=rev > Log: > the calculator has been separated into a contribution > (contribution-binding-sca-calculator) and a number of launchers that are able > to start contributions providing components implementing the Calculator > interface > > Removed: > tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/calculator/ > Modified: > tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/pom.xml > > Modified: tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/pom.xml > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/pom.xml?rev=945552&r1=945551&r2=945552&view=diff > ============================================================================== > --- tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/pom.xml (original) > +++ tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/pom.xml Tue May 18 09:19:30 2010 > @@ -43,7 +43,6 @@ > <activeByDefault>true</activeByDefault> > </activation> > <modules> > - <module>calculator</module> > <module>calculator-osgi</module> > <module>calculator-rmi-reference</module> > <module>calculator-rmi-service</module> > > >
