On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:46 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:40 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: >> What do others think about these renames? I don't think this new name >> "contribution-binding-sca-calculator" is really an improvement over >> the old simple name "calculator". Its too long and i'm not sure the >> calculator sample point is mainly about binding-sca isn't it more just >> demonstrating some simple assembly? Also, i though the agreement on >> the sample tidy up thread was on using sub-directories to group >> samples instead of the sample name? >> >> ...ant >> >> On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:19 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Author: slaws >>> Date: Tue May 18 09:19:30 2010 >>> New Revision: 945552 >>> >>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=945552&view=rev >>> Log: >>> the calculator has been separated into a contribution >>> (contribution-binding-sca-calculator) and a number of launchers that are >>> able to start contributions providing components implementing the >>> Calculator interface >>> >>> Removed: >>> tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/calculator/ >>> Modified: >>> tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/pom.xml >>> >>> Modified: tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/pom.xml >>> URL: >>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/pom.xml?rev=945552&r1=945551&r2=945552&view=diff >>> ============================================================================== >>> --- tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/pom.xml (original) >>> +++ tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/pom.xml Tue May 18 09:19:30 2010 >>> @@ -43,7 +43,6 @@ >>> <activeByDefault>true</activeByDefault> >>> </activation> >>> <modules> >>> - <module>calculator</module> >>> <module>calculator-osgi</module> >>> <module>calculator-rmi-reference</module> >>> <module>calculator-rmi-service</module> >>> >>> >>> >> > > Subdirectories is fine by me. I'm giving that a go with the rmi one > which has multiple contributions. That will shorten the name. > > Simon >
Ok great, sorry if that was a misunderstanding on my part. ...ant
