On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:40 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 7:13 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Sun, Aug 15, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> It seems that Tuscany SCA 2.x pom [1] is still using an old version of >>> Apache parent pom [2] that points to old repositories which has not >>> been updated with Tuscany specific artifacts. I'll look into move that >>> to use the most recent released version of the Apache parent pom [3] >>> to make sure we use the most recent repositories and other shared >>> configurations. >>> >>> >>> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/pom.xml >>> [2] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/pom/tags/apache-4/pom.xml >>> [3] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/maven/pom/tags/apache-7/pom.xml >>> >> >> BTW, should we ask infrastructure to remove the old SNAPSHOTs >> available at the old snapshot repository to avoid any possible >> conflicts as they seem to be at least several months old ? >> >> [1] >> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sca/ >> >> >> -- >> Luciano Resende >> http://people.apache.org/~lresende >> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 >> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >> > > What's the situation with any future 1.x and travel sample releases. > Are we going via Nexus repo for those. Maybe we don't have a choice > but before we remove the old stuff we'd need to fix the 1.x pom in the > same way. >
IMHO we should leave 1.x alone, I'm pretty underwhelmed by the 2.x move to Nexus, all it seems to do is change from the old people.apache.org staging repos that we could use with all the existing command line tools to use a new place thats only accessible through a slow and a less functional web GUI. ...ant
