On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 2:03 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 9:59 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> BTW, should we ask infrastructure to remove the old SNAPSHOTs >>>>> available at the old snapshot repository to avoid any possible >>>>> conflicts as they seem to be at least several months old ? >>>>> >>>>> [1] >>>>> http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-snapshot-repository/org/apache/tuscany/sca/ >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Luciano Resende >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~lresende >>>>> http://twitter.com/lresende1975 >>>>> http://lresende.blogspot.com/ >>>>> >>>> >>>> What's the situation with any future 1.x and travel sample releases. >>>> Are we going via Nexus repo for those. Maybe we don't have a choice >>>> but before we remove the old stuff we'd need to fix the 1.x pom in the >>>> same way. >>>> >>> >>> IMHO we should leave 1.x alone, I'm pretty underwhelmed by the 2.x >>> move to Nexus, all it seems to do is change from the old >>> people.apache.org staging repos that we could use with all the >>> existing command line tools to use a new place thats only accessible >>> through a slow and a less functional web GUI. >>> >>> ...ant >>> >> >> Will moving to Nexus be mandatory now or in the future? >> > > I don't think so. Nexus is really aimed at maven based releases and > not all projects use maven, and making things mandatory is not the > sort of thing that the ASF really likes to do. > > ...ant >
But one way or another, when hudson is building and publishing snapshots it's going to Nexus even before we had done any changes, and that's why I was having problems, as the people.apache.org snapshots were several months old. We should probably change the 1.x version of the apache pom as well, and that does not require us to move to use Nexus for releases as we are still doing manual steps for the 1.x release. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
