On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino > <[email protected]> wrote: >> Are there any plans to apply the fix described in SCA spec ASSEMBLY-223 [1] >> to the Tuscany SCA XML schemas? >> >> A diff between the OASIS CD05 schema [2] and the Tuscany 2.x trunk schema >> [3] shows that Tuscany has applied a different fix (or workaround?) to the >> issue reported in ASSEMBLY-223. >> >> I think it would be good to apply the official fix from OASIS. >> >> [1] http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-223 >> [2] http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-assembly/sca-core-1.1-cd05.xsd >> [3] >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/assembly-xsd/src/main/resources/sca-core-1.1-cd05.xsd >> >> Thanks >> -- >> Jean-Sebastien >> > > Hi Sebastien > > Yes, we need to move to the latest set of OASIS schema wholesale. It's > a little difficult to tell precisely what version that is. Either > CD05-rev1 or CD06 as they are having revision number discussions. > > This is going to cause some pain for a few days as we sort out the new > features. We have been carrying a few Tuscany specific changes where > we were getting ahead of the formal application of fixes to the OASIS > XSD so we do need to sort those out also. > > I don't know how hard it's going to be yet. We need to get the latest > XSD and give them a go. Personally I'd like us to get the otests back > to a level of stability before doing the refresh so that we're not > fighting too many fronts at once. There maybe limits to this as I > expect some of the new otests depend on the new schema. At the moment > it feels like next week will be the time to do this. Anyone else have > thoughts? >
Has anyone tried or would like to try this yet? I'm having some issues with the jms binding schema that i wonder if might be fixed by updating to the latest sca schemas, but your comment about it causing pain for a few days puts me off trying it. ...ant
