On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 10:06 AM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:24 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Are there any plans to apply the fix described in SCA spec ASSEMBLY-223 [1] >>> to the Tuscany SCA XML schemas? >>> >>> A diff between the OASIS CD05 schema [2] and the Tuscany 2.x trunk schema >>> [3] shows that Tuscany has applied a different fix (or workaround?) to the >>> issue reported in ASSEMBLY-223. >>> >>> I think it would be good to apply the official fix from OASIS. >>> >>> [1] http://www.osoa.org/jira/browse/ASSEMBLY-223 >>> [2] http://docs.oasis-open.org/opencsa/sca-assembly/sca-core-1.1-cd05.xsd >>> [3] >>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/modules/assembly-xsd/src/main/resources/sca-core-1.1-cd05.xsd >>> >>> Thanks >>> -- >>> Jean-Sebastien >>> >> >> Hi Sebastien >> >> Yes, we need to move to the latest set of OASIS schema wholesale. It's >> a little difficult to tell precisely what version that is. Either >> CD05-rev1 or CD06 as they are having revision number discussions. >> >> This is going to cause some pain for a few days as we sort out the new >> features. We have been carrying a few Tuscany specific changes where >> we were getting ahead of the formal application of fixes to the OASIS >> XSD so we do need to sort those out also. >> >> I don't know how hard it's going to be yet. We need to get the latest >> XSD and give them a go. Personally I'd like us to get the otests back >> to a level of stability before doing the refresh so that we're not >> fighting too many fronts at once. There maybe limits to this as I >> expect some of the new otests depend on the new schema. At the moment >> it feels like next week will be the time to do this. Anyone else have >> thoughts? >> > > Has anyone tried or would like to try this yet? I'm having some issues > with the jms binding schema that i wonder if might be fixed by > updating to the latest sca schemas, but your comment about it causing > pain for a few days puts me off trying it. > > ...ant >
I think we've got back to the stage with the otests where we can give this a try. They're not all passing yet but we're down to a small enough number failing to allow us to assess the impact of the schema change. If no one else steps up I could give it a go locally in the next few days and report back here on the effect. Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
