> @Simon: Regarding the calculator sample, I don't know the exact content of
> it. You guys are probably better suited to take this decision.
> Regarding the osgi samples, I personally wouldn't go into much deeper
> fragmentation at the root level of the samples/ folder, but I can see it as
> a special subfolder of sca-features/ (like webapps/ for getting-started/).
> But I also don't know what the osgi integration consists of..
> (implementations, bindings?)
>
>
If we're going to put it under features it would probably be better to
separate out the individual features, e.g.
sca-features/
implementation-osgi
distributed-osgi/
static/
dynamic/
osgi-runtime/
We then already have some launcher content and we could extend it, e.g.
running-tuscany/
launcher-embedded-osi/
launcher-osgi-runtime/
If people like this better than that's fine by me
Simon
Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org
Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
