On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:19 PM, ant elder <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 11:03 PM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 8:11 AM, Florian MOGA <[email protected]> wrote: >>> I believe having those differentiated will make people aware of the relation >>> between sca and tuscany. 'sca-features' and 'sca-extensions' try to make >>> this distinction. Probably 'sca-features' and 'tuscany-features' would be >>> best for us but they are confusing for somebody that is just starting to >>> check tuscany out. In conclusion, we just need to find 2 two self-explaining >>> names. Let's have a day or two for brainstorming that. Feel free to suggest >>> names. >>> To sum it up, here are some options we have now: >>> sca-features / sca-extensions >>> sca-features / tuscany-features >>> sca-features / sca-additions >>> sca-features / sca-addons >>> sca-features / sca-tuscany-addons >>> sca-spec-features / sca-non-spec-features >>> sca-spec-features / sca-spec-extensions (here extensions can be understood >>> as xep-s are for rfc-s...) >>> >> >> >> Just my 0.00002 c >> >> If you guys, very experienced with the contents of the samples are >> having a hard time on classifying these samples, the users that are >> trying to understand Tuscany will have a much more hard time to find a >> sample particularly if we go with structure in [1]. Just have this in >> mind when you continue with the work, and maybe richer documentation >> explaining and grouping the samples are more valuable then a >> multilevel folder structure. >> >> [1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sandbox/samples/ >> > > I'm having some trouble parsing your comments Luciano. You > specifically point at the arrangement in the sandbox but have you > looked in trunk recently, which has already changed to have a > multilevel folder structure. The sandbox area is just tinkering with > the folder names and grouping. > > ...ant >
Yes, looked into both... I liked the ability to do a "ls -la" and see all samples... and then, if I wanted to learn more about a specific sample, I could go inside the readme to get details. Now, I have to list the higher folder structure, and start navigating the sub-folders to see what's available. Anyway, let's see what our users say about the new structure. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
