Hi Simon, I'm currently studying things for a major enhancement on the comet binding and helping out with the samples when finding time. It's fine if you estimate completing fixes on the json databinding this or the next week. Let me know when you're done and I'll proceed with improving the sample.
On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Simon Laws <[email protected]>wrote: > On Wed, Sep 29, 2010 at 11:20 AM, Florian MOGA <[email protected]> wrote: > > I've seen Simon started fixing things on the json databinding and I would > > like to update the jsonp sample as well to also use arrays and > BigDecimal. > > Are we keeping the current format for the scdl or switch to the wire > > declaration? I can't estimate how much such a change would take but if it > > needs some time I propose to deffer it as it looks like a nice > enhancement > > for the next releases after 2.0. > > > > 1.x is a little odd at the moment in that I have JSONP working there > with the JSON databinding from 2.x. Other binding that use this > databinding, e.g. JSON-RPC don't work with the 2.x version but I'm not > of a mind to fix that in 1.x as it should all work in 2.x. > > I 'm yet to port the array fix over to 2.x. I'll do that this week > some time. Also I have a few local BigDecimal changes that I'm > thinking about. I'll decide if they need committing this week if I get > time. > > Having said this any samples in 2.x to test this stuff are very much > appreciated. Even better if you want to help out porting the fixes. > > Re. the SCDL format. I'd like to try the HTTP wire format varient but > haven't had time yet. I'd like to get the 2.0 beta out first. > > Simon > > -- > Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org > Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com >
