On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Simon Nash <[email protected]> wrote: > ant elder wrote: >> >> On Fri, Oct 1, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Luciano Resende <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >>>> What should we do with contrib? >>> >>> From previous long discussion, contrib should in trunk, and can be >>> excluded from a release. >>> >> >> I think we should revisit trunk/contrib. >> >> The suggested purpose was that it was a place to put things that were >> to be built with the trunk build to ensure that they don't get broken. >> I don't think that happens, for one most of the contrib stuff isn't >> finished so doesn't have any tests so we've no idea if it actually >> does work or not, and secondly AFAICT no one, and i mean no one, >> actually builds trunk/contrib regularly anyway. >> >> I agree with Florian and think we should get rid of it and just use >> the other contrib folder. >> >> ...ant >> >> > I think trunk/contrib is a good idea and I'd like to put this structure > into 1.x after 1.6.1 is done. It would be used for the thiungs currently > in trunk but not included in releases. >
Whats the problem with instead just putting those things in the existing contrib folders at tuscany/sca-java-1.x/contrib/ and tuscany/sca-java-2.x/contrib/? ...ant
