snip... > >> >> what's the async folder? it's got modules-like pom and seems to include a >> launcher... shouldn't the launcher get into running-tuscany and the other >> one into getting-started as comments say it demonstrates >> synchronous/asynchronous invocation? > > I'm going to defer commenting on this one to others for now as i'd need to > go work out what its really trying to show an dhow best to do that
It's just showing asyn operations. There's no need for a launcher in here as it should work with any of the other lauchers (need to be tests of course). > >> >> there are a number of samples which are not marked either as contributions >> or webapps: maven-osgi-junit, distributed-osgi, implementation-composite >> folder. Should these samples have "-contribution" appended at the end? would >> that make the names unnecessarily long? > > I think the things in implementation-composite should be moved to getting > started Moving one would be fine. Don't need both in getting started. I suggest we leave the ws version in learning-more. I.e. you don't need to show the user every combination in getting started. That's what learning-more gives us the the opportunity to do. > > The OSGi ones are a bit tricky as they don't really match the new samples > structure, maybe there should be a separate folder for OSGi in samples. Why do you say that they don't match the structure? They are contributions that can we started with (OSGi) launchers. > > ...ant > Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
