On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Simon Laws <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >>> - why the appearance of transitive dependencies in projects that >>> depend on the aggregate jar is the shade plugin's fault. Surely this >>> is our fault for not marking the dependency on the base pom as >>> optional in the aggregate jar pom. >>> >> >> I may be missing what you're suggesting but if they're optional or >> provided then they wont get included in the aggregate jar which isn't >> what we want. >> >> ...ant >> > > Is that really true for optional dependencies? > > Simon > > -- > Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org > Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com >
And I mean to say I'll give it a go and see if I can make it work. Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
