The most comprehensive doc is in the README file, IIRC thats mostly
written by your good self Mike.
...ant
On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 10:31 AM, Mike Edwards
<mike.edwards.inglen...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ant,
>
> I've taken a look - is there any documentation for this plugin somewhere?
>
> Yours, Mike.
>
> On 17/06/2011 04:37, ant elder wrote:
>>
>> Still need one more vote to be able to release this please.
>>
>> ...ant
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 11:33 AM, Florian Moga<moga....@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> No, that's not an issue. I was checking with you in case the plugin had
>>> to
>>> detect the webapp and construct the zip file in a different way so that
>>> the
>>> Node will know to start the webapp.
>>>
>>> In this case, everything seems fine, so here my +1.
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 1:16 PM, ant elder<antel...@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 10:59 AM, Florian Moga<moga....@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Ant,
>>>>> It now works fine with the helloworld sample. I've checked and it uses
>>>>> alpha3 with mvn help:describe
>>>>> -Dplugin=org.apache.tuscany.sca:tuscany-zip-plugin.
>>>>> I've tried packaging webapps as zip and running them with something
>>>>> like
>>>>> node = NodeFactory.newInstance().createNode(new Contribution("foo",
>>>>> "target/helloworld-webapp-2.0-SNAPSHOT.zip"));
>>>>> node.start();
>>>>> but the Tuscany runtime simply logs
>>>>> INFO: Loading contribution:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> file:/home/fmoga/coding/apache-tuscany/trunk/samples/getting-started/helloworld-webapp/target/helloworld-webapp-2.0-SNAPSHOT.zip
>>>>> and doesn't deploy the webapp. Is this plugin intended to support
>>>>> webapps as
>>>>> well? Couldn't find any information related to this in the README.
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Florian
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> No I don't expect that would work presently, but from what you've said
>>>> it sounds like the tuscany-zip-plugin did work ok and create a zip
>>>> contribution but the issue is that the NodeFactory Node doesn't know
>>>> who to run that as a webapp. Is this something that needs to be
>>>> supported, why would you want a webapp not packaged as a .war? Either
>>>> way, is this an issue for this plugin release or could it be left for
>>>> a later release?
>>>>
>>>> ...ant
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
