On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 12:43 PM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: > There are two answers to that. Firstly the reason the files aren't > included is because resource includes clause in the pom.xml only > mentions the LICENSE/NOTICE but not the README so they don't get > picked up in the built jar, the other reason of why its like that is > because its never been called out that the jars we release must > include doc files within them, so this plugin didn't on the previous > releases and none of the other maven plugins of any of the module jars > we've released have either. > > Its obviously just an oversight and it seems reasonable that those doc > files would be included and so I've updated trunk for this plugin so > that they will get included on the next release, but should this block > this release? IMHO it shouldn't as we've not required it for any other > jars we've released in the past, leaving this to the next release to > fix seems ok to me. So I'm hoping someone will still give another +1 > on this vote thread. > > ...ant > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2011 at 11:59 AM, Mike Edwards > <mike.edwards.inglen...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Ant, >> >> Why is this famed README not in either of the jar files: >> >> tuscany-zip-plugin-alpha3.jar >> tuscany-zip-plugin-alpha3-sources.jar >> >> >> Yours, Mike. >> >> >> On 17/06/2011 11:32, ant elder wrote: >>> >>> The most comprehensive doc is in the README file, IIRC thats mostly >>> written by your good self Mike. >>> >>> ...ant >>> >> >> >> >> >
I've tried it and the plugin works. As for the README It is an oversight that it's not in there but not enough for me to vote against it so +1 for this release. Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
