On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 3:16 PM, ant elder <antel...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:54 PM, ant elder <ant.el...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> I've been trying to help a user get going with one of the samples >>> using the latest code but its ended up needing a bunch of change to >>> the sample pom.xml's to get it to work with the latest snapshot code. >>> One of the issues is if you checkout a sample like >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/sca-java-2.x/trunk/samples/getting-started/helloworld/ >>> and try to build it that doesn't work unless you've built trunk >>> locally. >> >> So, wouldn't this be a similar issue if you get a released version of >> the helloworld with a released version of tuscany compared to the most >> recent snapshots ? >> >>> But thats just one of the reasons, its been ages since we did >>> a trunk release and there are lots of good changes in there. Last time >>> we talked about this I couldn't find three people who said they'd vote >>> for a release, If i just cut an RC of what the trunk builds now i >>> expect there are a lot of broken samples missing doc and and incorrect >>> readme's so whats the minimum we could do to fix that which would get >>> three +1s? If i just did a trunk source release + maven module release >>> but no binary distro would anyone vote for that? Or if i stripped out >>> all the samples or maybe except for one or two samples which really >>> worked and had good READMEs would you vote for that? Or what else >>> would it take? >>> >>> ...ant >>> >> >> What would be the "version name" for the release ? I think we should >> do a regular milestone/beta release and I'd be ok if some samples >> might be broken, but I wouldn't like to see source only distros, as >> that would kind require the users to have to build anyway, unless they >> are using maven which it's not really a requirement we have imposed >> into users before. >> > > Ok thats sounding more promising, i don't mind not doing a source only > release i just want _a_ release with the module jars in maven central, > i don't mind what its called 2.0-Beta3 or M6 or something else. So how > about if its called 2.0-Beta3 and based off the current trunk so the > samples and distro are as they are. I'll try and clean up some > helloworld samples but i wont have the time to make all of the samples > perfect. > > ...ant >
What's the timeframe you are looking for ? I could look at some samples and other minor cleanups over the weekend. -- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://twitter.com/lresende1975 http://lresende.blogspot.com/
