On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 4:43 PM, Luciano Resende <luckbr1...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 6:48 AM, Mike Edwards > <mike.edwards.inglen...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Folks, >> >> I'd like to see us do a full 2.x release - not another Beta. >> >> 2.x has been around for a while and it's in pretty good shape. A full >> release is called for in my opinion. If some samples aren't of the right >> quality, then leave them out for now - they can be added back later once >> they are in acceptable shape. >> >> > > I'm OK with 2.x release as long as : there is source and binary > distributions, and there are few samples that demonstrates different > ways of running tuscany. if people are in a rush to get something out, > I'm also fine with a beta3 in a week timeframe, and 2.x within a month > timeframe. > > Thoughts ? >
Ok a few of us have now said we'll spend a bit of time on release work over the next days so lets do that and see how it goes. I'll create a beta3 RC1 next week and we can see how it looks, and use it as a stepping stone release to 2.0 shortly after, or if it turns out that it already looks really fine we can just rename the RC to 2.0 and do the release vote on that. I'd guess we'll inevitably end up wanting a bit more polish on a 2.0 release so it will take more work which is why i'd still like to start with a beta3 now so as to get something out now. ...ant
