On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 6:37 PM, Raymond Feng <enjoyj...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > Before the changes, we use jabsorb as the jsonrpc 1.0 implementation. I > decided to use a home grown for number of reasons: > 1) The jsonrpc protocol is simple enough. I'm trying to avoid the dependency > to a non-active 3rd party project > 2) I'm trying to leverage Jackson to improve performance > 3) I want to use JSONRPC 2.0 at some point for binding.sca remoting > 4) I want to try gzip encoding for some situations > Thanks, > Raymond
OK interesting Raymond. JSONRPC as an alternative delegate for binding.sca sounds good. Simon -- Apache Tuscany committer: tuscany.apache.org Co-author of a book about Tuscany and SCA: tuscanyinaction.com
