Hi Joachim, > this was only an example. Meanwhile I favour the idea of a new file > extension for extensions.
which means somebody can rename a new extension, requiring license acceptance, to an old extension, and then run it without licence acceptance in 2.0.3. Is this desired? Also, aren't extensions to weak to distinguish file content? Ciao Frank -- - Frank Schönheit, Software Engineer [EMAIL PROTECTED] - - Sun Microsystems http://www.sun.com/staroffice - - OpenOffice.org Database http://dba.openoffice.org - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
