Frank Schönheit - Sun Microsystems Germany wrote:
Hi Joachim,
this was only an example. Meanwhile I favour the idea of a new file
extension for extensions.
which means somebody can rename a new extension, requiring license
acceptance, to an old extension, and then run it without licence
acceptance in 2.0.3. Is this desired?
See this thread at [EMAIL PROTECTED] for a discussion of why
changing anything in manifest.xml does not help here, anyway (.zip).
-Stephan
Also, aren't extensions to weak to distinguish file content?
Ciao
Frank
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
