Everett,

thanks for your statement about self voicing apps, absolutely true.

To your problem: We will do some more investigations.

Malte.

PS: Did you subscribe to [EMAIL PROTECTED] yet?


Everett Zufelt wrote:
> On the surface putting a reader in the program seems like a god idea. 
> are some reasons that it may not work well:
>  
> a) Assistive Technology (AT) companies have spent much time and money
> making their products work, for the most part, well.  A partial
> re-invention of the wheel would be required.
> b) Why reinvent a wheel if there already is one.
> c) Most visually impaired and blind users who currently own
> screen-readers are comfortable with how they work and would have to
> learn the nuances of a new system (keystrokes etc.).
> d) Why bother software developers who are trying to make a good product
> with having to incorporate scren-reading abilities?
>  
> I have also heard that MS is incorporating voce to text and text to
> speach in Vista.  No telling, however, how well they will work.
>  
> Everett
>  
>  
> 
>      ----- Original Message -----
>     *From:* bogus_01 <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     *To:* dev@ui.openoffice.org <mailto:dev@ui.openoffice.org>
>     *Sent:* Saturday, February 25, 2006 10:54 AM
>     *Subject:* Re: [ui-dev] JAWS 7.0 and OpenOffice 2.0
> 
>     Why not put a reader in the program?  It would help solve the
>     accessiblility issue and open the program up to people who are
>     visually impaired and solve the problem.
>      
>     I've heard rumors that MicroSoft is considering that in their Vista.
>      
>     Stu
> 
>         ----- Original Message -----
>         *From:* Everett Zufelt <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>         *To:* dev@ui.openoffice.org <mailto:dev@ui.openoffice.org>
>         *Sent:* Saturday, February 25, 2006 7:18 AM
>         *Subject:* [ui-dev] JAWS 7.0 and OpenOffice 2.0
> 
>         Good morning,
>          
>         I have posted this bug with OpenOffice's accessibility in the
>         past and was refered (as a suggestion) to Freedom Scientific,
>         the developer of the JAWS screen reader.  I spoke with them,
>         they were of little help, referring me to Sun.  Since then I
>         have been doing some thinking and believe that what I am going
>         to describe below is not a JAWS problem.  I do not know if the
>         problem lies in the OpenOffice code, or in the JAVA
>         Accessibility API.
>          
>         When I have a document open in OpenOffice Writer, and I use the
>         u/d arrow keys to move from line to line, lines after a hard
>         return are only spoke if visited a second time.  This is a
>         little hard to explain, perhaps an example
>          
>         Example:
>         Dear sir,
>          
>         This is my letter to you as an example, Hopefully this line is
>         long enough to wrap to the next line so that it works as an
>         example.  If not, hopefully everyone can use their
>         imaginiation.  Goodbye.
>          
>         Sincerely,
>         xxx
>          
>         In the above example, if I were starting at the top of the
>         document "Dear" and using the down arrow to read by line, the
>         first line of the message body "This my letter..." would only be
>         read if I went down to the second line in the paragraph and then
>         pressed the up arrow to go back to the first line.  This is a
>         little annoying but I can work around it with paragraphs. 
>         However, the same would hold true for the "Sincerely"
>         line.  However, in this case, there is not second line in the
>         paragraph to move back up from, therefor, JAWS will not read the
>         text at all.  That is, if a paragraph of text fits nicely onto
>         one line I can not read it once it is written.  What I hear
>         instead of the text I am expecting is "blank".  Pretty much
>         making OpenOffice Writer useless to a blind user of JAWS.
>          
>         Now, like I said, I am not sure where the problem lies, but
>         expect it is somewhere in the OpenOffice code or the Java
>         Accessibility API, though, I do not rule out Freedom
>         Scientific.  This is a pretty major issue, as there is really no
>         reason to incorporate the JAVA access technology if if the
>         application remains, for all intents and purposes, unusable.
>          
>         I don't mean to complain about the product, only to emphasize
>         what really needs to be addressed to make it truely accessible.
>          
>         Thank you for your continued assistance,
>         Everett

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to