I compared the source-release vs the svn - it's OK, but has an extra dir level, and copied the fixedVersions 2x. I don't think that's serious enough to block the release; I'll put in a Jira for fixing on the next release.
It does build, and the license / notice looks good. [x] +1 OK to release -Marshall On 8/2/2011 11:42 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: > This update is for 3 things: > > 1) LICENSE/NOTICE added to top level for this project in SVN. > 2) Changed parent pom to the most recently released UIMA parent pom. This > allowed removing lots of stuff from this project's POM, as the settings are > now > inherited > 3) Fixed the changes-plugin invocation to get it to run with the > apache-release > profile and generate the issuesFixed. > > The SVN tag is > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/build/tags/uima-build-resources-2-rc2 > > The artifacts (source / jars) are here: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-001/org/apache/uima/uima-build-resources/2/ > > As before, there are no binary assemblies - this is just maven build tooling. > > Please inspect these artifacts, see if you can build from source-release.zip > (above), verify the source-release matches the SVN tag (except for small > packaging deltas) and verify the license/notice files, then vote > > [ ] +1 OK to release > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Not ok to release, because ... > > Thanks. > > -Marshall > > >
