+1
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 10:55 AM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: > I compared the source-release vs the svn - it's OK, but has an extra dir > level, > and copied the fixedVersions 2x. I don't think that's serious enough to block > the release; I'll put in a Jira for fixing on the next release. > > It does build, and the license / notice looks good. > > [x] +1 OK to release > > -Marshall > > On 8/2/2011 11:42 PM, Marshall Schor wrote: >> This update is for 3 things: >> >> 1) LICENSE/NOTICE added to top level for this project in SVN. >> 2) Changed parent pom to the most recently released UIMA parent pom. This >> allowed removing lots of stuff from this project's POM, as the settings are >> now >> inherited >> 3) Fixed the changes-plugin invocation to get it to run with the >> apache-release >> profile and generate the issuesFixed. >> >> The SVN tag is >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/build/tags/uima-build-resources-2-rc2 >> >> The artifacts (source / jars) are here: >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-001/org/apache/uima/uima-build-resources/2/ >> >> As before, there are no binary assemblies - this is just maven build tooling. >> >> Please inspect these artifacts, see if you can build from source-release.zip >> (above), verify the source-release matches the SVN tag (except for small >> packaging deltas) and verify the license/notice files, then vote >> >> [ ] +1 OK to release >> [ ] 0 Don't care >> [ ] -1 Not ok to release, because ... >> >> Thanks. >> >> -Marshall >> >> >> >
