The zip and tgz builds are different, done on different platforms, with
different levels of doxygen:
linux: 1.3.9.1, Windows: 1.6.2. They look somewhat different, but I don't
think that's an issue.
There are two entries that show up in the Windows version that look quite
different from all the rest. You can see this most clearly in the Class
Hierarchy view on the windows version. Here's a snippet:
uima::FeatureStructure <classuima_1_1FeatureStructure.html>
* uima::AnnotationFS <classuima_1_1AnnotationFS.html>
o uima::DocumentFS <classuima_1_1DocumentFS.html>
* uima::BasicArrayFS< T, ARRAY_TYPE > <classuima_1_1BasicArrayFS.html>
o uima::ArrayFS <classuima_1_1ArrayFS.html>
o uima::BooleanArrayFS <classuima_1_1BooleanArrayFS.html>
Only two items have something following the class, that looks like <A,B,C,...>
One is shown above for uima::BasicArrayFS, and the other is this one:
uima::BasicListFS< T, LIST_TYPE, ELIST_TYPE, NELIST_TYPE, HEAD_FEATURE,
TAIL_FEATURE > <classuima_1_1BasicListFS.html>
The Linux doxygen show both of these without the <....> part. I raise this in
complete ignorance - it may be fine, or it may be indicating some kind of issue
that should be fixed.
-Marshall
On 1/16/2012 2:03 PM, Bhavani Iyer wrote:
Marshall thanks for the reviewing the packages.
Updated uimacpp 2.4.0 builds are available at
http://people.apache.org/~bhavani/uimacpp-release-candidates/2.4.0/02/
These contain fixes for the various issues reported by Marshall. The
Windows and
Linux source distributions now contain the same set of files.
Please review and report any problems you find.
Thanks,
Bhavani
On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Marshall Schor<[email protected]> wrote:
In general, the source-release.zip file is supposed to have these
properties:
1) it should be the same (with perhaps some minor exceptions) as the svn
tag
2) Checking out the tag and "building" from the tag should give some
result;
getting the source-release.zip file and "building from that, should give
essentially the same result.
See http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what
I'm not sure having a linux-source and a windows-source is the best idea
for
this. Could we have a source-release that looks more like the svn tag, and
serves for both windows and linux targets? Or is there some reason that's
not
such a good approach? Note that current Apache practice is to name this
file
....source-release.zip (and only provide the zip form). This is specified
(for
maven based builds) in the common apache super-pom.
-Marshall
On 1/9/2012 11:30 AM, Bhavani Iyer wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to do a release of UIMA C++ SDK.
The release will include updates to the ActiveMQ C++ service wrapper,
improvements to the Linux build process and bug fixes.
The source and binary packages are available here:
http://people.apache.org/~bhavani/uimacpp-release-candidates/2.4.0/01/
The SVN tag is
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimacpp/tags/uimacpp-2.4.0-rc1
The issues fixed are listed RELEASE_NOTES.html in the binary zip/tar
release.
Please install and test the packages and report any problems you find.
Thanks,
Bhavani
