The docs on Window were built using doxygen 1.7.6.1 and the one in the Linux distribution were built with an older version of doxygen 1.3.9.1. There seems to be a difference in the handling of C++ templates.
Bhavani On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 10:27 PM, Marshall Schor <[email protected]> wrote: > The zip and tgz builds are different, done on different platforms, with > different levels of doxygen: > linux: 1.3.9.1, Windows: 1.6.2. They look somewhat different, but I > don't think that's an issue. > > There are two entries that show up in the Windows version that look quite > different from all the rest. You can see this most clearly in the Class > Hierarchy view on the windows version. Here's a snippet: > > uima::FeatureStructure <classuima_1_**1FeatureStructure.html> > > * uima::AnnotationFS <classuima_1_1AnnotationFS.**html> > o uima::DocumentFS <classuima_1_1DocumentFS.html> > * uima::BasicArrayFS< T, ARRAY_TYPE > <classuima_1_1BasicArrayFS.**html> > o uima::ArrayFS <classuima_1_1ArrayFS.html> > o uima::BooleanArrayFS <classuima_1_1BooleanArrayFS.**html> > > Only two items have something following the class, that looks like > <A,B,C,...> One is shown above for uima::BasicArrayFS, and the other is > this one: > > uima::BasicListFS< T, LIST_TYPE, ELIST_TYPE, NELIST_TYPE, HEAD_FEATURE, > TAIL_FEATURE > <classuima_1_1BasicListFS.**html> > > The Linux doxygen show both of these without the <....> part. I raise > this in complete ignorance - it may be fine, or it may be indicating some > kind of issue that should be fixed. > > -Marshall > > > On 1/16/2012 2:03 PM, Bhavani Iyer wrote: > >> Marshall thanks for the reviewing the packages. >> >> Updated uimacpp 2.4.0 builds are available at >> http://people.apache.org/~**bhavani/uimacpp-release-** >> candidates/2.4.0/02/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ebhavani/uimacpp-release-candidates/2.4.0/02/> >> >> These contain fixes for the various issues reported by Marshall. The >> Windows and >> Linux source distributions now contain the same set of files. >> >> Please review and report any problems you find. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Bhavani >> >> On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 4:14 PM, Marshall Schor<[email protected]> wrote: >> >> In general, the source-release.zip file is supposed to have these >>> properties: >>> >>> 1) it should be the same (with perhaps some minor exceptions) as the svn >>> tag >>> 2) Checking out the tag and "building" from the tag should give some >>> result; >>> getting the source-release.zip file and "building from that, should give >>> essentially the same result. >>> >>> See >>> http://www.apache.org/dev/**release.html#what<http://www.apache.org/dev/release.html#what> >>> >>> I'm not sure having a linux-source and a windows-source is the best idea >>> for >>> this. Could we have a source-release that looks more like the svn tag, >>> and >>> serves for both windows and linux targets? Or is there some reason >>> that's >>> not >>> such a good approach? Note that current Apache practice is to name this >>> file >>> ....source-release.zip (and only provide the zip form). This is >>> specified >>> (for >>> maven based builds) in the common apache super-pom. >>> >>> -Marshall >>> >>> On 1/9/2012 11:30 AM, Bhavani Iyer wrote: >>> >>>> Hello, >>>> >>>> I'd like to do a release of UIMA C++ SDK. >>>> >>>> The release will include updates to the ActiveMQ C++ service wrapper, >>>> improvements to the Linux build process and bug fixes. >>>> >>>> The source and binary packages are available here: >>>> http://people.apache.org/~**bhavani/uimacpp-release-** >>>> candidates/2.4.0/01/<http://people.apache.org/%7Ebhavani/uimacpp-release-candidates/2.4.0/01/> >>>> >>>> The SVN tag is >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/**asf/uima/uimacpp/tags/uimacpp-** >>>> 2.4.0-rc1<https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/uimacpp/tags/uimacpp-2.4.0-rc1> >>>> >>>> The issues fixed are listed RELEASE_NOTES.html in the binary zip/tar >>>> release. >>>> >>>> Please install and test the packages and report any problems you find. >>>> >>>> Thanks, >>>> Bhavani >>>> >>>>
