[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13261985#comment-13261985
]
Marshall Schor commented on UIMA-2391:
--------------------------------------
Here's a work-around. The obvious one is to replace the range spec with
uima.cas.string (in other words, deleted the allowed-values, and allow any
values).
I presume you have some intent to restrict this, though. It sounds like you
want it restricted in some "core" implementation to some set , e.g. a,b,c, but
are willing to have other users arbitrarily extend this with other values.
You could put the set of allowed values into a parameter, and then write a
small bit of extra code to do whatever checking you think is appropriate,
whenever you think is appropriate. Would this approach be reasonable for your
use case?
> Uima type merging for string subtypes not working
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: UIMA-2391
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2391
> Project: UIMA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core Java Framework
> Affects Versions: 2.3.1AS
> Environment: Linux on Power
> Reporter: Charles de Saint-Aignan
> Priority: Critical
>
> The basic situation is that we are providing a UIMA-based core that other
> teams can extend to suit their needs. As such we are making use of UIMA type
> merging to allow them to add new features to existing types. This approach
> works fine since JCasGen merges the two definitions of the given type and
> produces a superset of the features. This is well documented here:
> http://uima.apache.org/d/uimaj-2.3.1/references.html#ugr.ref.jcas.merging_types.jcasgen_support
>
> However, in addition to this, we have the case where we have a string subtype
> with given allowedValues - lets say values a, b and c. The other team wants
> to extend this type and have additional allowedValues, say value d. Ideally,
> what I would like to do is the following (which follows the pattern used for
> adding features):
> Type Definition #1 (provided by core):
> <typeDescription>
> <name>com.ibm.Type</name>
> <description></description>
> <supertypeName>uima.cas.String</supertypeName>
> <allowedValues>
> <value>
> <string>a</string>
> <description></description>
> </value>
> <value>
> <string>b</string>
> <description></description>
> </value>
> <value>
> <string>c</string>
> <description></description>
> </value>
> </allowedValues>
> </typeDescription>
> Type Definition #2 (extension to core):
> <typeDescription>
> <name>com.ibm.Type</name>
> <description></description>
> <supertypeName>uima.cas.String</supertypeName>
> <allowedValues>
> <value>
> <string>d</string>
> <description></description>
> </value>
> </allowedValues>
> </typeDescription>
> In this case I wanted UIMA to recognize the two definitions at runtime and
> allow the superset of allowedValues. However, this does not do the trick -
> at runtime UIMA throws an exception saying that value d is not an allowed
> value for com.ibm.Type.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
