[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2391?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13262102#comment-13262102
]
Marshall Schor commented on UIMA-2391:
--------------------------------------
Another kind of workaround - don't rely on type merging. Instead, adopt a
strategy for combining annotators that allows constructing whatever common type
system you need. This would allow you to have a common shared type system, and
if a configuration required additional "allowed values", you could edit the
descriptor and add them (after checking manually, that doing so wouldn't break
some other annotator that might have been relying on the more limited set).
Type merging was envisioned more for the case where the XML descriptors for an
annotator couldn't be modified.
> Uima type merging for string subtypes not working
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: UIMA-2391
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2391
> Project: UIMA
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Core Java Framework
> Affects Versions: 2.3.1AS
> Environment: Linux on Power
> Reporter: Charles de Saint-Aignan
> Priority: Critical
> Attachments: UIMA-2391.patch
>
>
> The basic situation is that we are providing a UIMA-based core that other
> teams can extend to suit their needs. As such we are making use of UIMA type
> merging to allow them to add new features to existing types. This approach
> works fine since JCasGen merges the two definitions of the given type and
> produces a superset of the features. This is well documented here:
> http://uima.apache.org/d/uimaj-2.3.1/references.html#ugr.ref.jcas.merging_types.jcasgen_support
>
> However, in addition to this, we have the case where we have a string subtype
> with given allowedValues - lets say values a, b and c. The other team wants
> to extend this type and have additional allowedValues, say value d. Ideally,
> what I would like to do is the following (which follows the pattern used for
> adding features):
> Type Definition #1 (provided by core):
> <typeDescription>
> <name>com.ibm.Type</name>
> <description></description>
> <supertypeName>uima.cas.String</supertypeName>
> <allowedValues>
> <value>
> <string>a</string>
> <description></description>
> </value>
> <value>
> <string>b</string>
> <description></description>
> </value>
> <value>
> <string>c</string>
> <description></description>
> </value>
> </allowedValues>
> </typeDescription>
> Type Definition #2 (extension to core):
> <typeDescription>
> <name>com.ibm.Type</name>
> <description></description>
> <supertypeName>uima.cas.String</supertypeName>
> <allowedValues>
> <value>
> <string>d</string>
> <description></description>
> </value>
> </allowedValues>
> </typeDescription>
> In this case I wanted UIMA to recognize the two definitions at runtime and
> allow the superset of allowedValues. However, this does not do the trick -
> at runtime UIMA throws an exception saying that value d is not an allowed
> value for com.ibm.Type.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
