Any other opinions about where the plugin should be placed?
If not I will go ahead and put it into the uimaj/trunk.
Jörn
On 01/23/2013 02:10 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
On 01/23/2013 01:27 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
Hi,
I'd guess that the jcasgen functionality of UIMA changes rarely.
Maybe put it to the sandbox at the same level as TextMarker or
uimaFIT and give it a separate release cycle?
Just because it rarely changes we do not need to give it a separate
release cycle, it would only be an issue if it would be the other way
around.
In my opinion it should go into uimaj/trunk so it can be released as
part of the UIMA SDK. Having it there will avoid the overhead of an extra
release and its version is always in sync with the UIMA SDK.
Jörn
