+1 Marshall
On 1/25/2013 5:57 AM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
> Any other opinions about where the plugin should be placed?
> If not I will go ahead and put it into the uimaj/trunk.
>
> Jörn
>
> On 01/23/2013 02:10 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
>> On 01/23/2013 01:27 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'd guess that the jcasgen functionality of UIMA changes rarely. Maybe put
>>> it to the sandbox at the same level as TextMarker or uimaFIT and give it a
>>> separate release cycle?
>>
>> Just because it rarely changes we do not need to give it a separate release
>> cycle, it would only be an issue if it would be the other way around.
>> In my opinion it should go into uimaj/trunk so it can be released as part of
>> the UIMA SDK. Having it there will avoid the overhead of an extra
>> release and its version is always in sync with the UIMA SDK.
>>
>> Jörn
>
>
