Hi,
I compared the source-release zip (unzipped) with the svn export of the tag -
looks good.
There's one difference: The svn has a .project file included in the
ExampleProject. It has some special build setup that might be "required" to
make the ExampleProject work with TextMarker:
<buildSpec>
<buildCommand>
<name>org.eclipse.dltk.core.scriptbuilder</name>
<arguments>
</arguments>
</buildCommand>
</buildSpec>
<natures>
<nature>org.apache.uima.textmarker.ide.nature</nature>
</natures>
If this is required, then it should have been in the source zip package, but
wasn't...
If not required, then perhaps it should be deleted from svn. (I also see a
.buildpath checked into SVN - is that required for this project?).
-Marshall
On 1/28/2013 8:58 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the second release candidate of the sandbox project Apache UIMA TextMarker is
> ready for voting. This vote also includes our new composite repository.
>
> Staging repository:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-183/
>
> SVN tag:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/TextMarker/tags/uimaj-textmarker-parent-2.0.0-rc2
>
>
> Archive with all sources:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/TextMarker-2.0.0-rc2/uimaj-textmarker-parent-2.0.0-source-release.zip
>
>
> Composite repository with three update sites: uimaj, uima-as and
> uima-textmarker-2.0.0:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/TextMarker-2.0.0-rc2/eclipse-update-site
>
>
> Binaries and sources:
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/TextMarker-2.0.0-rc2/src_bin
>
> The issues fixed are in the RELEASE_NOTES.html in the src/bin packages.
> They can also be found here:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.0TextMarker%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20TextMarker%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC
>
>
> Documentation (pdf file):
> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/TextMarker-2.0.0-rc2/tools.textmarker.book.pdf
>
>
> Please vote on release:
>
> [ ] +1 OK to release
> [ ] 0 Don't care
> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ...
>
> Thanks.
>
> Peter
>
>
