On 1/29/2013 5:03 PM, Peter Klügl wrote: > Am 29.01.2013 21:49, schrieb Marshall Schor: >> I notice that the top level project (the one you run mvn install on to build >> everything) is uimaj-textmarker-parent. >> >> This is different from the conventions of other projects - where the top >> level >> would have been something like: >> >> uimaj-textmarker. >> > > I agree. I chose this layout after the discussion of Richard and you about > this topic, but I do not really have a strong opinion about it. > > I would have named the reactor/top level project "uimaj-textmarker", but there > was already a project with this name, the implementation of the analysis > engine and rule inference, which can be renamed to "uimaj-textmarker-core".
The prefix uimaj I think is by convention used for the Java UIMA SDK. I would suggest to make it easier on your user community to make a smaller name - such as "textmarker" for your top level project :-) It will be under the Maven group name "org.apache.uima", so adding uimaj is probably redundant for the textmarker project. -M
