many thanks!
2013/3/6 Peter Klügl <[email protected]> > Hi, > > I added you to the Administrators. > > Best, > > Peter > > > Am 06.03.2013 18:02, schrieb Tommaso Teofili: > > Hi all, >> >> can anyone with needed privileges either create Jira release versions >> 2.3.2 >> (unreleased) for AlchemyAPIAnnotator ,SolrCas, LuCas, TikaAnnotator, >> ConceptMapper (just for start then maybe we'll need it for others as well) >> or allow me to do that (by administrating UIMA Jira project)? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Tommaso >> >> >> 2013/3/4 Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> >> >> >>> >>> 2013/3/4 Marshall Schor <[email protected]> >>> >>> On 3/4/2013 2:47 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I'm hoping to have some time this week to work on the release of (some >>>>> >>>> of) >>>> >>>>> the addons. >>>>> >>>> Nice! >>>> >>>>> I noticed all of the modules depend on the uima-addons-parent which is >>>>> basically just a reactor pom (mostly useful to aggregate modules), the >>>>> >>>> only >>>> >>>>> important bits which may affect the release is the jiraVersion. >>>>> Since we planned to release on a per module basis maybe we can create >>>>> different "jira releases" on Jira and write them inside each module's >>>>> >>>> pom >>>> >>>>> so that for Solrcas 2.3.2 we create a Jira release in Jira and write >>>>> >>>> down >>>> >>>>> such Jira version in the Solrcas pom and release with that. >>>>> >>>> +1 >>>> >>>>> Also we would need to remove the current 2.3.1 (aggregate) addons Jira >>>>> version from the uima-addons-parent >>>>> >>>> Probably don't need to fiddle with this, just override it in the >>>> individual >>>> add-on project's pom? >>>> >>>> and release a uima-addons-parent 2.3.2 >>>>> which doesn't have such information inside so that it doesn't affect >>>>> its >>>>> modules. >>>>> >>>> I think this may not be needed, because I believe (?) that a pom's >>>> setting of a >>>> property will override any setting that might be there from any of its >>>> parent's >>>> poms. >>>> >>>> Did I misunderstand something, or am I mistaken on how maven overrides >>>> work here? >>>> >>>> no I think you're right, just I think it'd be somewhat unclean to have >>> the >>> parent bound to a jiraVersion which is completely unrelated to the >>> modules, >>> but I agree we can go with the existing one (I'd have to revert the >>> addons >>> to use uima-addons-parent 2.3.1 to avoid snapshot dependencies) by just >>> overriding that setting. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Tommaso >>> >>> >>> >>> -Marshall >>>> >>>> >>> >
