On 3/6/2013 12:53 PM, Peter Klügl wrote: > Hi, > > I added you to the Administrators. > > Best, > > Peter
+1 :-) Marshall > > > Am 06.03.2013 18:02, schrieb Tommaso Teofili: >> Hi all, >> >> can anyone with needed privileges either create Jira release versions 2.3.2 >> (unreleased) for AlchemyAPIAnnotator ,SolrCas, LuCas, TikaAnnotator, >> ConceptMapper (just for start then maybe we'll need it for others as well) >> or allow me to do that (by administrating UIMA Jira project)? >> >> Thanks in advance, >> Tommaso >> >> >> 2013/3/4 Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]> >> >>> >>> >>> 2013/3/4 Marshall Schor <[email protected]> >>> >>>> On 3/4/2013 2:47 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote: >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>> I'm hoping to have some time this week to work on the release of (some >>>> of) >>>>> the addons. >>>> Nice! >>>>> I noticed all of the modules depend on the uima-addons-parent which is >>>>> basically just a reactor pom (mostly useful to aggregate modules), the >>>> only >>>>> important bits which may affect the release is the jiraVersion. >>>>> Since we planned to release on a per module basis maybe we can create >>>>> different "jira releases" on Jira and write them inside each module's >>>> pom >>>>> so that for Solrcas 2.3.2 we create a Jira release in Jira and write >>>> down >>>>> such Jira version in the Solrcas pom and release with that. >>>> +1 >>>>> Also we would need to remove the current 2.3.1 (aggregate) addons Jira >>>>> version from the uima-addons-parent >>>> Probably don't need to fiddle with this, just override it in the >>>> individual >>>> add-on project's pom? >>>> >>>>> and release a uima-addons-parent 2.3.2 >>>>> which doesn't have such information inside so that it doesn't affect its >>>>> modules. >>>> I think this may not be needed, because I believe (?) that a pom's >>>> setting of a >>>> property will override any setting that might be there from any of its >>>> parent's >>>> poms. >>>> >>>> Did I misunderstand something, or am I mistaken on how maven overrides >>>> work here? >>>> >>> no I think you're right, just I think it'd be somewhat unclean to have the >>> parent bound to a jiraVersion which is completely unrelated to the modules, >>> but I agree we can go with the existing one (I'd have to revert the addons >>> to use uima-addons-parent 2.3.1 to avoid snapshot dependencies) by just >>> overriding that setting. >>> >>> Regards, >>> Tommaso >>> >>> >>> >>>> -Marshall >>>> >>> > >
