The page http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html says that creative commons attribution licensed things can be included in apache distributions, but it links to version 2.5 of that. The icons we include link to version 3.0 of that: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
I've asked on legal-discuss if this is OK and if the legal/resolved.html web page should be updated. I don't think this will be an issue... -Marshall On 5/7/2013 7:12 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: > Hi, > > the second release candidate of the sandbox project Apache UIMA Ruta > v2.0.1 is ready for voting. > > Changes in RC2 vs RC1: > - updated composite repository is provided > - small bug fixed: UIMA-2875 > > Staging repository: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-015/ > > SVN tag: > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/ruta/tags/ruta-2.0.1-rc2 > > Composite repository: > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/uima/eclipse-update-site > > Archive with all sources: > http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.0.1-rc2/ruta-2.0.1-source-release.zip > > The issues fixed are in the RELEASE_NOTES.html. > They can also be found here: > https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.1ruta%22%20AND%20component%20%3D%20ruta%20AND%20status%20in%20(Resolved%2C%20Closed)%20ORDER%20BY%20priority%20DESC > > ONLY FOR REVIEWING: > > Single eclipse update site > http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.0.1-rc2/ruta-2.0.1 > > Documentation (pdf file): > http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.0.1-rc2/tools.ruta.book.pdf > > > Please vote on release: > > [ ] +1 OK to release > [ ] 0 Don't care > [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ... > > Thanks. > > Peter >
