dev  

Messages by Thread

• • Re: [PR] Issue #422: Exclude release-related marker files from source distributions [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• [I] Exclude release-related marker files from source distributions [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Exclude release-related marker files from source distributions [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• [VOTE] UIMA Java SDK 3.6.0 RC1 Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • Re: [VOTE] UIMA Java SDK 3.6.0 RC1 Pablo Duboue
  • Re: [VOTE] UIMA Java SDK 3.6.0 RC1 Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • Re: [VOTE] UIMA Java SDK 3.6.0 RC1 Pablo Duboue
  • Re: [VOTE] UIMA Java SDK 3.6.0 RC1 Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • Re: [VOTE] UIMA Java SDK 3.6.0 RC1 Viorel Morari
  • Re: [VOTE] UIMA Java SDK 3.6.0 RC1 Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • [CANCELED][VOTE] UIMA Java SDK 3.6.0 RC1 Richard Eckart de Castilho
• [I] Apache UIMA Java SDK 3.6.0 [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Apache UIMA Java SDK 3.6.0 [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• Re: [I] BOM should not inherit build setup from parent POM [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• [I] Move the Maven plugins to a separate repository and release cycle [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• [PR] Issue #417: BOM should not inherit build setup from parent POM [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #417: BOM should not inherit build setup from parent POM [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Include uimaFIT artifacts in binary distribution [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• [PR] Issue #393: Include uimaFIT artifacts in binary distribution [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #393: Include uimaFIT artifacts in binary distribution [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Update dependencies (3.6.0) [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Update dependencies (3.6.0) [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Clean up PearPackagingMavenPlugin [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• Proposal to drop drop binary ZIP distribution and go Maven Central / update-site only Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • Re: Proposal to drop drop binary ZIP distribution and go Maven Central / update-site only Peter Klügl
  • Re: Proposal to drop drop binary ZIP distribution and go Maven Central / update-site only Pablo Duboue
• [PR] Issue #409: Update dependencies [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #409: Update dependencies [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • [PR] Issue #409: Update dependencies [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #409: Update dependencies [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #409: Update dependencies [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • [PR] Issue #409: Update dependencies [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #409: Update dependencies [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • [PR] Issue #409: Update dependencies [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #409: Update dependencies [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• [PR] Issue #407: Clean up PearPackagingMavenPlugin [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #407: Clean up PearPackagingMavenPlugin [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Consider resource manager when loading type descriptions [uima-ruta] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Consider resource manager when loading type descriptions [uima-ruta] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Clean up code [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• [PR] Issue #176 - Upgrade dependencies [uima-ruta] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #176 - Upgrade dependencies [uima-ruta] via GitHub
• [PR] Issue #177: Consider resource manager when loading type descriptions [uima-ruta] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #177: Consider resource manager when loading type descriptions [uima-ruta] via GitHub
  • [PR] Issue #177: Consider resource manager when loading type descriptions [uima-ruta] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #177: Consider resource manager when loading type descriptions [uima-ruta] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Remove toolchains [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• [PR] Issue #179: Remove toolchains [uima-ruta] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #179: Remove toolchains [uima-ruta] via GitHub
• [PR] Issue #404: Remove toolchains [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #404: Remove toolchains [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Potential memory leak in Annotation Browser View [uima-ruta] via GitHub
• [I] On yourkit thread analysis shows executor threads are blocked during multithreading scenrios. [uima-ruta] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] On yourkit thread analysis shows executor threads are blocked during multithreading scenrios. [uima-ruta] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] On yourkit thread analysis shows executor threads are blocked during multithreading scenrios. [uima-ruta] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] On yourkit thread analysis shows executor threads are blocked during multithreading scenrios. [uima-ruta] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] On yourkit thread analysis shows executor threads are blocked during multithreading scenrios. [uima-ruta] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] On yourkit thread analysis shows executor threads are blocked during multithreading scenrios. [uima-ruta] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] On yourkit thread analysis shows executor threads are blocked during multithreading scenrios. [uima-ruta] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] On yourkit thread analysis shows executor threads are blocked during multithreading scenrios. [uima-ruta] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] On yourkit thread analysis shows executor threads are blocked during multithreading scenrios. [uima-ruta] via GitHub
• [PR] 70 UI ma parent pom 18 [uima-parent-pom] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #70: UIMA Parent POM 18 [uima-parent-pom] via GitHub
• [VOTE] UIMA Parent POM 18 RC-1 Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • Re: [VOTE] UIMA Parent POM 18 RC-1 Peter Klügl
  • Re: [VOTE] UIMA Parent POM 18 RC-1 Viorel Morari
  • Re: [VOTE] UIMA Parent POM 18 RC-1 Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • [RESULT] UIMA Parent POM 18 RC-1 Richard Eckart de Castilho
• [I] UIMA Parent POM 18 [uima-parent-pom] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] UIMA Parent POM 18 [uima-parent-pom] via GitHub
• [PR] No issue: Added issue template for release issue [uima-parent-pom] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] No issue: Added issue template for release issue [uima-parent-pom] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Update plugins and dependencies (18) [uima-parent-pom] via GitHub
• [PR] Issue #402: Provide bnd plugin to generate package imports based on imports in UIMA descriptors [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #402: Provide bnd plugin to generate package imports based on imports in UIMA descriptors [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• [I] Provide bnd plugin to generate package imports based on imports in UIMA descriptors [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Provide bnd plugin to generate package imports based on imports in UIMA descriptors [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Add support for unofficial JavaDoc tags [uima-parent-pom] via GitHub
• [PR] Issue #66: Add support for unofficial JavaDoc tags [uima-parent-pom] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #66: Add support for unofficial JavaDoc tags [uima-parent-pom] via GitHub
• [PR] Issue #385: Allow import of type systems published through SPI [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #385: Allow import of type systems published through SPI [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • [PR] Issue #385: Allow import of type systems published through SPI [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #385: Allow import of type systems published through SPI [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #385: Allow import of type systems published through SPI [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Merge uimaFIT modules into UIMAJ repository [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• [PR] Issue #64: Update plugins and dependencies [uima-parent-pom] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #64: Update plugins and dependencies [uima-parent-pom] via GitHub
  • [PR] Issue #64: Update plugins and dependencies [uima-parent-pom] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #64: Update plugins and dependencies [uima-parent-pom] via GitHub
• Does anybody need the aggregate JavaDoc API? Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • Re: Does anybody need the aggregate JavaDoc API? Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • Re: Does anybody need the aggregate JavaDoc API? Pablo Duboue
  • Re: Does anybody need the aggregate JavaDoc API? Richard Eckart de Castilho
• [PR] Refactoring/390 merge uima fit modules into UI maj repository [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #390: Merge uimaFIT modules into UIMA-J repository [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• [I] Adding features to superclass can trip up synchronization between JCas class and type system [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• [RFC] UIMA board report for Q3 2024 draft (due Wed Sep 11) Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • Re: [RFC] UIMA board report for Q3 2024 draft (due Wed Sep 11) Pablo Duboue
  • Re: [RFC] UIMA board report for Q3 2024 draft (due Wed Sep 11) Pablo Duboue
  • UIMA board report for Q3 2024 Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • UIMA board report for Q4 2024 (draft) Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • Re: UIMA board report for Q4 2024 Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • UIMA board report for Q2 2025 Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • Draft: UIMA board report for Q3 2025 Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • UIMA board report for Q3 2025 submitted Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • Draft: UIMA board report for Q1 2026 Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • Re: Draft: UIMA board report for Q1 2026 Pablo Duboue
  • Submitted UIMA board report for Q1 2026 Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • Draft: UIMA board report for Q2 2026 Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • UIMA board report for Q2 2026 Richard Eckart de Castilho
• [PR] Issue #387: Simplify creation of new UIMAContext [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #387: Simplify creation of new UIMAContext [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• [I] Simplify creation of new UIMAContext [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Simplify creation of new UIMAContext [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• Re: Merging uimaFIT into UIMA-J Pablo Duboue
  • Re: Merging uimaFIT into UIMA-J Peter Klügl
• JCas type not registered in JCasRegistry Daniel Cosio
  • Re: JCas type not registered in JCasRegistry Daniel Cosio
  • Re: JCas type not registered in JCasRegistry Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • Re: JCas type not registered in JCasRegistry Daniel Cosio
  • Re: JCas type not registered in JCasRegistry Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • Re: JCas type not registered in JCasRegistry Daniel Cosio
  • Re: JCas type not registered in JCasRegistry Richard Eckart de Castilho
• [I] Allow import of type systems published through SPI [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow import of type systems published through SPI [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• [PR] Issue #173: Potential memory leak in Annotation Browser View [uima-ruta] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #173: Potential memory leak in Annotation Browser View [uima-ruta] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #173: Potential memory leak in Annotation Browser View [uima-ruta] via GitHub
• Uima 3.x ddspring.xml Daniel Cosio
  • Re: Uima 3.x ddspring.xml Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • Re: Uima 3.x ddspring.xml Daniel Cosio
  • Re: Uima 3.x ddspring.xml Richard Eckart de Castilho
• Uima 3 upgrade loggin issue Daniel Cosio
  • Re: Uima 3 upgrade loggin issue Pablo Duboue
  • Re: Uima 3 upgrade loggin issue Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • Re: Uima 3 upgrade loggin issue Daniel Cosio
• Google Summer of Code has ended Huy Ta
  • Re: Google Summer of Code has ended Pablo Duboue
  • Re: Google Summer of Code has ended Richard Eckart de Castilho
• [I] Selecting a class from a CAS can yield a classcast exception if the CAS contains subclasses of the type not locally known [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Selecting a class from a CAS can yield a classcast exception if the CAS contains subclasses of the type not locally known [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Support implicit FSArray assigments with FeatureStructures [uima-ruta] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Support implicit FSArray assigments with FeatureStructures [uima-ruta] via GitHub
• Re: [I] Annotation assignment not working correctly [uima-ruta] via GitHub
• [PR] Issue #169: Annotation assignment not working correctly [uima-ruta] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #169: Annotation assignment not working correctly [uima-ruta] via GitHub
• [PR] Issue #382: Warning when PEAR contains a JCAS class that is used as a feature range outside the PEAR [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #382: Warning when PEAR contains a JCAS class that is used as a feature range outside the PEAR [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #382: Warning when PEAR contains a JCAS class that is used as a feature range outside the PEAR [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• [I] Warning when PEAR contains a JCAS class that is used as a feature range outside the PEAR [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Warning when PEAR contains a JCAS class that is used as a feature range outside the PEAR [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• [PR] Support for Aggregate CAS Multiplier [uima-uimacpp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Aggregate CAS Multiplier [uima-uimacpp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Aggregate CAS Multiplier [uima-uimacpp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Aggregate CAS Multiplier [uima-uimacpp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Aggregate CAS Multiplier [uima-uimacpp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Aggregate CAS Multiplier [uima-uimacpp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Aggregate CAS Multiplier [uima-uimacpp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Aggregate CAS Multiplier [uima-uimacpp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Aggregate CAS Multiplier [uima-uimacpp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Aggregate CAS Multiplier [uima-uimacpp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Aggregate CAS Multiplier [uima-uimacpp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Aggregate CAS Multiplier [uima-uimacpp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Aggregate CAS Multiplier [uima-uimacpp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Aggregate CAS Multiplier [uima-uimacpp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Aggregate CAS Multiplier [uima-uimacpp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Aggregate CAS Multiplier [uima-uimacpp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Aggregate CAS Multiplier [uima-uimacpp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Aggregate CAS Multiplier [uima-uimacpp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Aggregate CAS Multiplier [uima-uimacpp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Aggregate CAS Multiplier [uima-uimacpp] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Support for Aggregate CAS Multiplier [uima-uimacpp] via GitHub
• [PR] Issue #379: Clean up code [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #379: Clean up code [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • [PR] Issue #379: Clean up code [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #379: Clean up code [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• [PR] No issue: Unrequire status checks [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] No issue: Unrequire status checks [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• Re: [I] select(AnnotationBaseFs-type).count() seems to return MAX_LONG [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• [PR] Issue #368: select(AnnotationBaseFs-type).count() seems to return MAX_LONG [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #368: select(AnnotationBaseFs-type).count() seems to return MAX_LONG [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• [PR] Issue #371: Repeated creation of type systems can exhaust JVM metaspace [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #371: Repeated creation of type systems can exhaust JVM metaspace [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• Re: [I] serialVersionUID should be present and private [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• [PR] Issue #374: serialVersionUID should be present and private [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] Issue #374: serialVersionUID should be present and private [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• [PR] #372 - Allow adding URLs to the datapath [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [PR] #372 - Allow adding URLs to the datapath [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• [I] Allow adding URLs to the datapath [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Allow adding URLs to the datapath [uima-uimaj] via GitHub
• Ruta execution failing on load test/ batch run Raghunath Mahakud
  • Re: Ruta execution failing on load test/ batch run Raghunath Mahakud
  • Re: Ruta execution failing on load test/ batch run Richard Eckart de Castilho
  • Re: Ruta execution failing on load test/ batch run Viorel Morari
  • Re: Ruta execution failing on load test/ batch run Peter Klügl
• Re: [I] Document is ambiguous error on executing ruta script. [uima-ruta] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Document is ambiguous error on executing ruta script. [uima-ruta] via GitHub
  • Re: [I] Document is ambiguous error on executing ruta script. [uima-ruta] via GitHub
• [I] Repeated creation of type systems can exhaust JVM metaspace [uima-uimaj] via GitHub

• Earlier messages
• Later messages