I've canceled the current vote.
Regards,
Tommaso

2013/6/24 Tommaso Teofili <[email protected]>

> Thanks Marshall for all your comments!
>
>
> 2013/6/20 Marshall Schor <[email protected]>
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I see there are failures in the Jenkins build for add-ons...
>>
>> I think it is not right to change the 2.3.2-SNAPSHOT level of the
>> uima-addons
>> parent to 2.3.3-SNAPSHOT, since there was not a 2.3.2 release of this.
>>
>
> I was thinking to release the parent first, then some modules separately
> as 2.3.2 (e.g. Solrcas 2.3.2) and then an aggregate of all the modules
> which were released as 2.3.2
>
>
>>
>> I'm not sure about some of the other changes to the addons-parent:
>>
>>   The RAT configuration was removed; this will now inherit from the
>> uima-wide
>> parent. The difference in these is it is now missing the exclude for
>> ".idea/**"
>> - which I think is for the IntelliJidea development environment.  This
>> may now
>> be a default exclude in RAT configuration anyways, so may not matter.
>>
>
> I'll check that.
>
>
>>
>>   There is an added m2e lifecycle mapping which replicates one in the
>> common
>> uima-wide pom, for maven-dependency-plugin - so that should be removed
>> from this
>> pom.
>>
>
> ok
>
>
>>
>>   There is a changed m2e lifecycle mapping for the uima-build-helper - the
>> change is it's marked ignore here, and in the common pom it's marked
>> execute.  I
>> think this should be removed from the addons-parent and just inherit from
>> the
>> uima-wide parent.
>>
>
> ok
>
>
>>
>>   If you agree with these changes to m2e configuration, I would remove the
>> entire configuration for m2e lifecycle from the addons-parent pom, and
>> let it
>> inherit from the uima-wide parent (5-SNAPSHOT, or 5, after the release is
>> voted
>> out).
>>
>
> yes, that sounds like the best option.
>
>
>>
>> I see you also removed the customized apache-release profile that was in
>> the
>> addons-parent.  I think that may be the right thing to do, but we'll see
>> as we
>> go forward :-).
>>
>
> yes, I think that's bad to have different profiles with the same purpose
> and name that basically do the same things if not strictly needed.
>
> I'll rollback for now and do these changes.
> Regards,
> Tommaso
>
>
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>> On 6/20/2013 10:51 AM, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
>> > Hi all,
>> >
>> > here's the first RC for uima-addons-parent 2.3.2.
>> > This version basically allows for better releasing individual addons
>> > modules by allowing specific jira versions (so it's a very trivial
>> change).
>> >
>> > Here's the SVN tag:
>> > http://svn.apache.org/r1495030
>> >
>> > Here's the related fixed issue(s):
>> >
>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.3.2%20addons-parent%22%20AND%20project%20%3D%20UIMA
>> >
>> > The vote is open for next 72 hours.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> > Tommaso
>> >
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to