On 8/9/2013 5:02 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: > This question had been discussed before the contribution [1]. > > Am 05.06.2012 um 13:56 schrieb Thilo Goetz <[email protected]>: > >>> So, how can we proceed? We uimaFIT folks started getting into initial >>> contact with the respective >>> license persons at our institutions to resolve the software grant. These >>> already mentioned that they >>> require the institutions to be mentioned somewhere. We assume that original >>> authors and institutions >>> will be mentioned in the NOTICES file. Individual source files will carry >>> the default Apache >>> license header which refers to the NOTICES file and will not carry author >>> tags. >> That can be done. We have something in there for IBM right now, we >> could do something along those lines. > > The NOTICE files are only present where required due to > third-party source being included, or in modules which > were present in the original contribution. > > Fair enough? I'll leave this trade off up to you. -Marshall
> > -- Richard > > [1] http://markmail.org/thread/wyvdxagbw5myiimn > > Am 09.08.2013 um 22:32 schrieb Marshall Schor <[email protected]>: > >> Some comment about the NOTICE files. >> >> NOTICE files are kind of Viral, in that the Apache license says that they >> must >> be reproduced in further packagings and distributions. Therefore, the normal >> convention is to keep NOTICE files as empty as is reasonable, and only put >> things there that must be included (because of other distributed thing's >> license >> requirements) or your own intent. >> >> I see some projects have additional NOTICE files with them, other projects do >> not have these. Is this intentional? Can the information be in files other >> than official (viral) NOTICE files? >> >> -Marshall >> >> On 8/8/2013 7:09 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I've posted uimaFIT 2.0.0 rc1. There were 70 Jiras fixed, see >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/issues/?jql=project%20%3D%20UIMA%20AND%20fixVersion%20%3D%20%222.0.0uimaFIT%22 >>> >>> The source and binary zip/tars are staged to >>> http://people.apache.org/~rec/uimafit-release-candidates/2.0.0-rc1/ >>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Erec/uimafit-release-candidates/2.0.0-rc1/> >>> >>> The Maven artifacts are here: >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-078/org/apache/uima/ >>> >>> The SVN tags are here: >>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/sandbox/uimafit/tags/uimafit-2.0.0-rc1 >>> >>> See http://uima.apache.org/testing-builds.html for suggestions on how to >>> test >>> release candidates. >>> >>> Please vote on release: >>> >>> [ ] +1 OK to release >>> [ ] 0 Don't care >>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because … >>> >>> Ok, this is my very first one for the ASF. Hit me! >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> -Richard >
