[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3097?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13735968#comment-13735968
 ] 

Richard Eckart de Castilho commented on UIMA-3097:
--------------------------------------------------

Comment by Judith:

{quote}
Alternative suggestions JCasIterable:

        •  -1 for IterablePipeline as to be similar to SimplePipeline
        •  +1 for PipelineIterable
        •  0  for JCasIterable (no change)
Alternative suggestions SimplePipeline.stepPipeline(readerDesc, aeDesc...):

        • -1 for .stepThroughPipeline because .stepPipeline isn't grammatically 
correct
        • -1 for .iteratePipeline as to be similar to .runPipeline
        • +1 for .iterate
        • -1 for .stepPipeline as to be similar to .runPipeline (no change)
{quote}
                
> Split JCasIterable into iterable and iterator parts
> ---------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-3097
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-3097
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: uimaFIT
>            Reporter: Richard Eckart de Castilho
>            Assignee: Richard Eckart de Castilho
>             Fix For: 2.0.0uimaFIT
>
>
> The JCasIterable is an Iterable and an Iterator at the same time. The 
> iterator() method returns just "this". This goes against the expectation that 
> an Iterable should return a fresh iterator when iterator() is called.
> JCasIterable should therefore be split. The JCasIterable should only be 
> creatable with descriptions.
> Calling iterator should create a new JCasIterator which then is based on 
> concrete reader and AE instances.

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to