On 11/20/2013 4:12 AM, Jens Grivolla wrote:
> I don't think you can group them in that way. You could of course put several
> repositories in a folder on your machine or on a server you use to share git
> repositories, but that is not really a grouping at the git level (it will put
> all your repositories at a common URL prefix, though).
>
> Apache has a flat structure for its git repositories, as you can see at
> http://git.apache.org/ and you can see that e.g. activemq uses the activemq-*
> prefix. The repositories are also mirrored at github
> (https://github.com/apache), and repositories there are only grouped by user
> (in this case "apache").
>
> So it seems that we would end up with adding the "uima-" prefix to the names
> in SVN, except for uima-as and uima-ducc that already include the prefix,
> right?
+1 -Marshall
>
> Let's just wait to see if we move things in SVN before asking for the mirror.
>
> -- Jens
>
> On 11/19/2013 11:51 PM, Marshall Schor wrote:
>> +1,
>>
>> There's already a uimaj-core (the core part of uimaj) :-)
>>
>> Is there a way to drop the top level "uima-" by having everything be under
>> some
>> top level "folder" (he said, showing his ignorance of Git conventions ;-) ) ?
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>> On 11/19/2013 3:00 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>>> So let's use uimaj -> uima-uimaj and uimacpp -> uima-uimacpp as well?
>>>
>>> -- Richard
>>>
>>> On 19.11.2013, at 10:43, Jens Grivolla <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I also changed uimacpp to uima-cpp for the same reason...
>>>>
>>>> On 11/19/2013 10:33 AM, Jens Grivolla wrote:
>>>>> I was trying to always have a uima-* prefix, so I used uima-core instead
>>>>> of uimaj, and uima-fit instead of uimafit. I'd rather use uima-uimafit
>>>>> then to make it clear that it's part of the uima project.
>>>>>
>>>>> Jens
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/18/2013 08:27 PM, Richard Eckart de Castilho wrote:
>>>>>> Could that be "uima-uimafit" or simply "uimafit"?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -- Richard
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 18.11.2013, at 17:08, Jens Grivolla
>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello, if there are no objections, I will file a ticket for the
>>>>>>> following on INFRA:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We would like to have a git mirror of the Apache UIMA SVN. As the
>>>>>>>> project has many submodules with individual trunk/branches/tags
>>>>>>>> structure we would like the following mapping:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> uimaj uima-core.git
>>>>>>>> uimacpp uima-cpp.git
>>>>>>>> uima-as uima-as.git (ignore uima-as/depend-on-parent-pom-4)
>>>>>>>> addons uima-addons.git
>>>>>>>> sandbox uima-sandbox.git (ignore
>>>>>>>> sandbox/{ruta,uima-ducc,uimafit})
>>>>>>>> sandbox/ruta uima-ruta.git
>>>>>>>> sandbox/uima-ducc uima-ducc.git
>>>>>>>> sandbox/uimafit uima-fit
>>>>>>>> site uima-site
>>>>>>>> build uima-build (ignore build/archive)
>>>>>>>> ignore eclipse-packagings
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> All of these follow the standard SVN layout.
>>>>>>> Comments?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Jens
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/15/2013 01:02 PM, Jens Grivolla wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ok, AFAICS due to the project structure we would actually need a
>>>>>>>> separate mirror for each sub-project (uimaj, uimacpp, uima-as,
>>>>>>>> uima-addons, uima-sandbox, ...)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Also, some sub-projects don't purely follow the trunk,tags,branches
>>>>>>>> structure, such as sandbox which additionally contains other
>>>>>>>> sub-projects (uimafit, ruta, ...) which have their own
>>>>>>>> trunk,tags,branches structure. These would probably need to have their
>>>>>>>> own independent mirrors outside of uima-sandbox.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I have no idea how to deal with eclipse-packagings, and uima-as has an
>>>>>>>> additional depend-on-parent-pom-4 at the top level that seems weird.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Any comments?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Jens
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On 11/15/2013 12:50 PM, Jörn Kottmann wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 11/15/2013 12:20 PM, Jens Grivolla wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Ok, so who can do it? Does it need to come from the PMC?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You can just go ahead and do it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Jörn
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
