Ah, great, thank you. I didn't submit to that mailing list. Best,
Peter Am 26.09.2014 15:26, schrieb Marshall Schor: > You can read all about the problems on the repository mailing list > ([email protected]). They are running in a degraded mode due to multiple > disk failures, and had to do something to get the sync-to-central process > unstuck and going again. I think they replaced "rsync" with something better, > too. > > They said everything was working again, and I checked (from the USA) and saw > the > ruta 2.1.1 artifacts here: > http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/uima/ > > except for the ruta-docbook, but probably the build was enhanced to skip > putting > this there. > > -Marshall > > > On 9/26/2014 7:05 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >> three days now, but no artifacts on maven central... >> >> I'll gonna send the announce on Monday in case with a mention that the >> artifacts will soon be available. >> >> Best, >> >> Peter >> >> Am 23.09.2014 14:48, schrieb Peter Klügl: >>> The vote passes, with 3 +1 votes and no other votes received: >>> >>> +1 Peter Klügl >>> +1 Marshall Schor >>> +1 Burn Lewis >>> >>> Thanks to all who reviewed and/or voted! >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Peter >>> >>> Am 03.09.2014 13:28, schrieb Peter Klügl: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> the first release candidate of Apache UIMA Ruta v2.2.1 is ready for voting. >>>> >>>> This is a bugfix release. >>>> >>>> Staging repository: >>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheuima-1034/ >>>> >>>> SVN tag: >>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/uima/ruta/tags/ruta-2.2.1 >>>> >>>> Update site: >>>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.2.1-rc1/eclipse-update-site/ruta >>>> >>>> Archive with all sources: >>>> http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/uima-releases/ruta-2.2.1-rc1/ruta-2.2.1-source-release.zip >>>> >>>> Overall 16 issues have been fixed for this release. >>>> They can be found in the RELEASE_NOTES.html. >>>> >>>> Please vote on release: >>>> >>>> [ ] +1 OK to release >>>> [ ] 0 Don't care >>>> [ ] -1 Not OK to release, because ... >>>> >>>> Thanks. >>>> >>>> Peter >>>> >>
